3-38698003-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_006514.4(SCN10A):c.5217C>T(p.Asp1739=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0306 in 1,614,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 861 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.023 ( 44 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.031 ( 817 hom. )
Consequence
SCN10A
NM_006514.4 synonymous
NM_006514.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.285
Genes affected
SCN10A (HGNC:10582): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 10) The protein encoded by this gene is a tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel alpha subunit. The properties of the channel formed by the encoded transmembrane protein can be altered by interaction with different beta subunits. This protein may be involved in the onset of pain associated with peripheral neuropathy. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 3-38698003-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38698003-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 240680.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-38698003-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.285 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0225 (3428/152244) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0329 (2237/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0318. There are 44 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1635 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 3428 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN10A | NM_006514.4 | c.5217C>T | p.Asp1739= | synonymous_variant | 28/28 | ENST00000449082.3 | NP_006505.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN10A | ENST00000449082.3 | c.5217C>T | p.Asp1739= | synonymous_variant | 28/28 | 1 | NM_006514.4 | ENSP00000390600 | P4 | |
SCN10A | ENST00000655275.1 | c.5241C>T | p.Asp1747= | synonymous_variant | 28/28 | ENSP00000499510 | ||||
SCN10A | ENST00000643924.1 | c.5214C>T | p.Asp1738= | synonymous_variant | 27/27 | ENSP00000495595 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0225 AC: 3426AN: 152128Hom.: 44 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3426
AN:
152128
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0263 AC: 6610AN: 251198Hom.: 103 AF XY: 0.0267 AC XY: 3628AN XY: 135736
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
6610
AN:
251198
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3628
AN XY:
135736
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0315 AC: 46038AN: 1461878Hom.: 817 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0316 AC XY: 22974AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
46038
AN:
1461878
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
22974
AN XY:
727244
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0225 AC: 3428AN: 152244Hom.: 44 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0220 AC XY: 1635AN XY: 74440
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
3428
AN:
152244
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1635
AN XY:
74440
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
38
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | Jun 10, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 10, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 28, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Brugada syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 21, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at