3-43561311-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_018075.5(ANO10):​c.1385G>A​(p.Arg462Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.625 in 1,613,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 319,572 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.60 ( 27946 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.63 ( 291626 hom. )

Consequence

ANO10
NM_018075.5 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.106
Variant links:
Genes affected
ANO10 (HGNC:25519): (anoctamin 10) The transmembrane protein encoded by this gene belongs to the anoctamin family of calcium-activated chloride channels, also known as the transmembrane 16 family. The encoded protein contains eight transmembrane domains with cytosolic N- and C-termini. Defects in this gene may cause autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia-10. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=6.683522E-7).
BP6
Variant 3-43561311-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-43561311-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 128387.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-43561311-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.869 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ANO10NM_018075.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1385G>A p.Arg462Gln missense_variant 9/13 ENST00000292246.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ANO10ENST00000292246.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1385G>A p.Arg462Gln missense_variant 9/131 NM_018075.5 P1Q9NW15-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.598
AC:
90911
AN:
151942
Hom.:
27926
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.500
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.589
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.684
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.525
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.890
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.727
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.642
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.576
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.605
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.600
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.658
AC:
165338
AN:
251442
Hom.:
55873
AF XY:
0.655
AC XY:
89039
AN XY:
135900
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.496
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.794
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.507
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.884
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.721
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.635
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.606
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.611
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.628
AC:
918204
AN:
1461782
Hom.:
291626
Cov.:
54
AF XY:
0.629
AC XY:
457574
AN XY:
727194
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.495
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.778
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.516
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.897
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.714
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.638
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.613
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.619
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.598
AC:
90984
AN:
152060
Hom.:
27946
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.606
AC XY:
45085
AN XY:
74360
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.500
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.684
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.525
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.890
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.727
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.642
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.605
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.600
Alfa
AF:
0.601
Hom.:
61003
Bravo
AF:
0.595
TwinsUK
AF:
0.609
AC:
2258
ALSPAC
AF:
0.611
AC:
2356
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.498
AC:
2193
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.587
AC:
5050
ExAC
AF:
0.650
AC:
78972
Asia WGS
AF:
0.783
AC:
2722
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.596
EpiControl
AF:
0.593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 10 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJul 18, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 25, 2019- -
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.068
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.69
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.62
CADD
Benign
7.0
DANN
Benign
0.91
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.051
T;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0057
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.84
T;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
6.7e-7
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.3
L;.;.;L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P;P;P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.21
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.089
Sift
Benign
0.24
T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.32
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0010
B;P;B;.;B
Vest4
0.015
MPC
0.11
ClinPred
0.0036
T
GERP RS
-5.4
Varity_R
0.088
gMVP
0.081

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3772165; hg19: chr3-43602803; API