3-45968585-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_024513.4(FYCO1):c.749G>A(p.Arg250Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.797 in 1,613,920 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 516,568 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R250W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024513.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cataract 18Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- early-onset nuclear cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- total early-onset cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.848 AC: 129014AN: 152118Hom.: 55309 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.847 AC: 212848AN: 251310 AF XY: 0.843 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.792 AC: 1156949AN: 1461684Hom.: 461193 Cov.: 85 AF XY: 0.795 AC XY: 577772AN XY: 727156 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.848 AC: 129140AN: 152236Hom.: 55375 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.853 AC XY: 63447AN XY: 74420 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cataract 18 Benign:3
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:2
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not specified Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at