3-49172929-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS2_Supporting
The NM_173546.3(KLHDC8B):c.160A>G(p.Met54Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000052 in 1,614,050 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_173546.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- classic Hodgkin lymphomaInheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_173546.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLHDC8B | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.160A>G | p.Met54Val | missense | Exon 2 of 6 | ENSP00000327468.2 | Q8IXV7 | ||
| KLHDC8B | c.160A>G | p.Met54Val | missense | Exon 2 of 6 | ENSP00000618606.1 | ||||
| KLHDC8B | c.160A>G | p.Met54Val | missense | Exon 2 of 6 | ENSP00000618608.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000123 AC: 31AN: 251162 AF XY: 0.000206 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000547 AC: 80AN: 1461764Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000894 AC XY: 65AN XY: 727206 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152286Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000537 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74476 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at