3-52392973-T-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_015512.5(DNAH1):c.10422T>C(p.Leu3474Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00559 in 1,613,646 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 69 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0037 ( 4 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0058 ( 65 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH1
NM_015512.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.40

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAH1 (HGNC:2940): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 1) This gene encodes an inner dynein arm heavy chain that provides structural support between the radial spokes and the outer doublet of the sperm tail. Naturally occurring mutations in this gene are associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia and multiple morphological anomalies of the flagella that result in asthenozoospermia and male infertility. Mice with a homozygous knockout of the orthologous gene are viable but have reduced sperm motility and are infertile. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2017]

DNAH1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

spermatogenic failure 18
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
ciliary dyskinesia, primary, 37
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, ClinGen
primary ciliary dyskinesia
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
non-syndromic male infertility due to sperm motility disorder
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

DNAH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).

BP6

Variant 3-52392973-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-52392973-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 478383.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.4 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00374 (569/151986) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0231 (111/4800). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0196. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 287 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein
DNAH1	NM_015512.5 link	c.10422T>C	p.Leu3474Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 65 of 78	ENST00000420323.7	NP_056327.4
DNAH1	XM_017006129.2 link	c.10491T>C	p.Leu3497Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 67 of 80		XP_016861618.1
DNAH1	XM_017006130.2 link	c.10422T>C	p.Leu3474Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 66 of 79		XP_016861619.1
DNAH1	XM_017006131.2 link	c.10365T>C	p.Leu3455Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 66 of 79		XP_016861620.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein
DNAH1	ENST00000420323.7 link	c.10422T>C	p.Leu3474Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 65 of 78	1	NM_015512.5	ENSP00000401514.2
DNAH1	ENST00000486752.5 link	n.10879T>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 64 of 77	2
DNAH1	ENST00000488988.5 link	n.2208T>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 12 of 25	2
DNAH1	ENST00000490713.5 link	n.1122T>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 8 of 20	5		ENSP00000419071.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00375

AC:

570

AN:

151868

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000920

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00308

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00202

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00424

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0233

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00142

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00475

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00567

AC:

1412

AN:

249216

AF XY:

0.00670

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000904

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00238

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00159

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00367

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00158

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00418

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00281

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00579

AC:

8458

AN:

1461660

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00632

AC XY:

4598

AN XY:

727108

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000717

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00224

AC:

100

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00161

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00380

AC:

151

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0233

AC:

2007

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00152

AC:

AN:

53384

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00520

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00511

AC:

5678

AN:

1111852

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00571

AC:

345

AN:

60372

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.481

Heterozygous variant carriers

515

1030

1544

2059

2574

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

236

472

708

944

1180

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00374

AC:

569

AN:

151986

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00386

AC XY:

287

AN XY:

74280

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000917

AC:

AN:

41422

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00308

AC:

AN:

15264

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00425

AC:

AN:

5174

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0231

AC:

111

AN:

4800

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

10580

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00474

AC:

322

AN:

67960

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00284

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

121

151

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00393

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00292

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00837

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00403

EpiControl

AF:

0.00504

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Jul 09, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 20, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

Spermatogenic failure 18;C4539798:Ciliary dyskinesia, primary, 37

Benign:1

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.61

CADD

Benign

3.0

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.71

PhyloP100

-1.4

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over