3-52403808-T-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2

The NM_004656.4(BAP1):c.1337A>G(p.Asn446Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000991 in 1,614,090 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N446T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000096 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BAP1
NM_004656.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.589

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BAP1 (HGNC:950): (BRCA1 associated protein 1) This gene belongs to the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase subfamily of deubiquitinating enzymes that are involved in the removal of ubiquitin from proteins. The encoded enzyme binds to the breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) via the RING finger domain of the latter and acts as a tumor suppressor. In addition, the enzyme may be involved in regulation of transcription, regulation of cell cycle and growth, response to DNA damage and chromatin dynamics. Germline mutations in this gene may be associated with tumor predisposition syndrome (TPDS), which involves increased risk of cancers including malignant mesothelioma, uveal melanoma and cutaneous melanoma. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

BAP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Kury-Isidor syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P
renal cell carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp

BAP1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.08877486).

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 14 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004656.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	BAP1	NM_004656.4	MANE Select	c.1337A>G	p.Asn446Ser	missense	Exon 13 of 17	NP_004647.1
	BAP1	NM_001410772.1		c.1283A>G	p.Asn428Ser	missense	Exon 13 of 17	NP_001397701.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
BAP1	ENST00000460680.6	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.1337A>G	p.Asn446Ser	missense	Exon 13 of 17	ENSP00000417132.1
BAP1	ENST00000469613.5	TSL:1	c.110A>G	p.Asn37Ser	missense	Exon 2 of 5	ENSP00000418320.1
BAP1	ENST00000296288.9	TSL:5	c.1283A>G	p.Asn428Ser	missense	Exon 13 of 17	ENSP00000296288.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152124

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000242

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000358

AC:

AN:

251434

AF XY:

0.0000294

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000260

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000958

AC:

AN:

1461848

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000110

AC XY:

AN XY:

727224

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000201

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53378

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000180

AC:

AN:

1112008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000166

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152242

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74448

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41528

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000653

AC:

AN:

15308

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

67986

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.325

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000494

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome

Uncertain:2

Sep 14, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 446 of the BAP1 protein (p.Asn446Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs751399960, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with stomach adenocarcinoma (PMID: 26689913). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 485251). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BAP1 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Oct 08, 2023

Baylor Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided

Uncertain:2

Oct 19, 2024

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The BAP1 c.1337A>G (p.Asn446Ser) variant has been reported in the published literature in an individual affected with stomach adenocarcinoma (PMID: 26689913 (2015)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00026 (9/34586 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant.

Aug 02, 2019

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Aug 10, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Nov 21, 2023

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This missense variant replaces asparagine with serine at codon 446 of the BAP1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with stomach adenocarcinoma (PMID: 26689913). This variant has been identified in 9/251434 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Melanoma, uveal, susceptibility to, 2;C3280492:BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome;C5676925:Kury-Isidor syndrome

Uncertain:1

Jun 10, 2024

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.068

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.53

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.70

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.93

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.019

Eigen

Benign

-0.27

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.16

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.60

LIST_S2

Benign

0.76

M_CAP

Benign

0.010

MetaRNN

Benign

0.089

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.20

PhyloP100

0.59

PrimateAI

Benign

0.45

PROVEAN

Benign

0.17

REVEL

Benign

0.11

Sift

Benign

0.47

Sift4G

Benign

1.0

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.22

MutPred

0.12

Gain of disorder (P = 0.1271)

MVP

0.64

MPC

0.30

ClinPred

0.038

GERP RS

4.9

PromoterAI

-0.035

Neutral

(source)

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.020

gMVP

0.23

Mutation Taster

=97/3

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over