3-52405266-G-A

Variant names:

• chr3-52405266-G-A
• rs143659795
• NM_004656.4:c.960C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_004656.4(BAP1):​c.960C>T​(p.Cys320Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000437 in 1,613,808 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0022 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00026 (2 hom.)
• Consequence: BAP1 NM_004656.4 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 1.21
• Publications: 3 publications found

Genes affected

BAP1 (HGNC:950): (BRCA1 associated protein 1) This gene belongs to the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase subfamily of deubiquitinating enzymes that are involved in the removal of ubiquitin from proteins. The encoded enzyme binds to the breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) via the RING finger domain of the latter and acts as a tumor suppressor. In addition, the enzyme may be involved in regulation of transcription, regulation of cell cycle and growth, response to DNA damage and chromatin dynamics. Germline mutations in this gene may be associated with tumor predisposition syndrome (TPDS), which involves increased risk of cancers including malignant mesothelioma, uveal melanoma and cutaneous melanoma. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

BAP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

• BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome

  Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
• Kury-Isidor syndrome

  Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P
• renal cell carcinoma

  Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp

ACMG classification

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
• BP6: Variant 3-52405266-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-52405266-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 240070.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.21 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00216 (329/152216) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00742 (308/41534). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00673. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 162 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 329 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BAP1	NM_004656.4	c.960C>T	p.Cys320Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 17	ENST00000460680.6	NP_004647.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BAP1	ENST00000460680.6	c.960C>T	p.Cys320Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 17	1	NM_004656.4	ENSP00000417132.1
BAP1	ENST00000296288.9	c.906C>T	p.Cys302Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 17	5		ENSP00000296288.5
BAP1	ENST00000490804.1	n.388C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 3	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00217 AC: 330 AN: 152098 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00746

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000655

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.0000946

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000882

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00143

GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000593 AC: 149 AN: 251310 AF XY: 0.000427

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00806

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000347

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000352

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000326

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000257 AC: 376 AN: 1461592 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000220 AC XY: 160 AN XY: 727110

African (AFR) AF: 0.00717 AC: 240 AN: 33478

American (AMR) AF: 0.000380 AC: 17 AN: 44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 26136

East Asian (EAS) AF: 0.0000252 AC: 1 AN: 39700

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.0000580 AC: 5 AN: 86256

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.0000188 AC: 1 AN: 53150

Middle Eastern (MID) AF: 0.00139 AC: 8 AN: 5750

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 0.0000665 AC: 74 AN: 1112008

Other (OTH) AF: 0.000497 AC: 30 AN: 60390

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00216 AC: 329 AN: 152216 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00218 AC XY: 162 AN XY: 74416

African (AFR) AF: 0.00742 AC: 308 AN: 41534

American (AMR) AF: 0.000654 AC: 10 AN: 15294

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 3472

East Asian (EAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 5180

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.000207 AC: 1 AN: 4828

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.0000946 AC: 1 AN: 10576

Middle Eastern (MID) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 294

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 0.0000882 AC: 6 AN: 68010

Other (OTH) AF: 0.00142 AC: 3 AN: 2116

Alfa AF: 0.000958 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00218

Asia WGS AF: 0.000866 AC: 3 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.00

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome Benign:5

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 22, 2024

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 15, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3

Jun 28, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 16, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Mar 09, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2

Jan 09, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 30, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2

-

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Melanoma, uveal, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:1

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.52
CADD	Benign	5.7
DANN	Benign	0.63
PhyloP100		1.2
Mutation Taster		=100/0	polymorphism

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.010		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143659795; hg19: chr3-52439282;