3-58130880-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_001457.4(FLNB):c.4362G>C(p.Pro1454Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000685 in 1,460,124 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1454P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001457.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- atelosteogenesis type IInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
- atelosteogenesis type IIIInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet
- Larsen syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
- spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
- Boomerang dysplasiaInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001457.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLNB | NM_001457.4 | MANE Select | c.4362G>C | p.Pro1454Pro | synonymous | Exon 25 of 46 | NP_001448.2 | ||
| FLNB | NM_001164317.2 | c.4362G>C | p.Pro1454Pro | synonymous | Exon 25 of 47 | NP_001157789.1 | |||
| FLNB | NM_001164318.2 | c.4362G>C | p.Pro1454Pro | synonymous | Exon 25 of 46 | NP_001157790.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLNB | ENST00000295956.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.4362G>C | p.Pro1454Pro | synonymous | Exon 25 of 46 | ENSP00000295956.5 | ||
| FLNB | ENST00000490882.5 | TSL:1 | c.4362G>C | p.Pro1454Pro | synonymous | Exon 25 of 47 | ENSP00000420213.1 | ||
| FLNB | ENST00000429972.6 | TSL:1 | c.4362G>C | p.Pro1454Pro | synonymous | Exon 25 of 46 | ENSP00000415599.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000404 AC: 1AN: 247266 AF XY: 0.00000747 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000685 AC: 10AN: 1460124Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 726170 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
FLNB-Related Spectrum Disorders Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.
not provided Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at