3-62371669-T-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PVS1_ModeratePM2
The NM_018008.4(FEZF2):c.853-2A>T variant causes a splice acceptor, intron change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018008.4 splice_acceptor, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZF2 | NM_018008.4 | c.853-2A>T | splice_acceptor_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000283268.8 | NP_060478.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZF2 | ENST00000283268.8 | c.853-2A>T | splice_acceptor_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_018008.4 | ENSP00000283268.3 | ||||
FEZF2 | ENST00000475839.1 | c.853-2A>T | splice_acceptor_variant, intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000418804.1 | |||||
FEZF2 | ENST00000486811.5 | c.853-2A>T | splice_acceptor_variant, intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000418589.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 19, 2022 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Canonical splice site variant with an unclear effect on protein function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Variants in candidate genes are classified as variants of uncertain significance in accordance with ACMG guidelines (Richards et al., 2015) - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
No publications associated with this variant yet.