3-78600262-GATT-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PM4_Supporting
The NM_002941.4(ROBO1):c.4789_4791delAAT(p.Asn1597del) variant causes a conservative inframe deletion change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000131 in 152,164 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002941.4 conservative_inframe_deletion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- neurooculorenal syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- pituitary hormone deficiency, combined or isolated, 8Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- pituitary stalk interruption syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1460890Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726782 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74334 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Heart, malformation of Uncertain:1
This variant was reported as 3:78649412 ROBO1 c.4789_4791delAAT N1597del ENST00000464233 in an individual (Nicolaou_ROBO1_Individual1) with KD (PMID: 26489027 (nicolaou2016)). Inheritance was reported as dominant (heterozygous) (NA). The variant was reviewed according to current ACMG recommendations and classified as Uncertain Significance (criteria: PM2_Supporting, PP3_Supporting) at the variant level; the gene-disease association is currently not established in curated databases. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at