4-113336009-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001386166.1(ANK2):​c.-58C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000818 in 1,614,100 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0025 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00064 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

ANK2
NM_001386166.1 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.47
Variant links:
Genes affected
ANK2 (HGNC:493): (ankyrin 2) This gene encodes a member of the ankyrin family of proteins that link the integral membrane proteins to the underlying spectrin-actin cytoskeleton. Ankyrins play key roles in activities such as cell motility, activation, proliferation, contact and the maintenance of specialized membrane domains. Most ankyrins are typically composed of three structural domains: an amino-terminal domain containing multiple ankyrin repeats; a central region with a highly conserved spectrin binding domain; and a carboxy-terminal regulatory domain which is the least conserved and subject to variation. The protein encoded by this gene is required for targeting and stability of Na/Ca exchanger 1 in cardiomyocytes. Mutations in this gene cause long QT syndrome 4 and cardiac arrhythmia syndrome. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).
BP6
Variant 4-113336009-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-113336009-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 238578.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr4-113336009-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00254 (387/152282) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00765 (318/41552). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00696. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 202 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 387 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ANK2NM_001148.6 linkc.3543C>T p.Ala1181Ala synonymous_variant Exon 30 of 46 ENST00000357077.9 NP_001139.3 Q01484-4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ANK2ENST00000357077.9 linkc.3543C>T p.Ala1181Ala synonymous_variant Exon 30 of 46 1 NM_001148.6 ENSP00000349588.4 Q01484-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00251
AC:
382
AN:
152164
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00760
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00236
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00139
AC:
348
AN:
250620
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00125
AC XY:
169
AN XY:
135472
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00981
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000752
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000199
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00415
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000203
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000638
AC:
933
AN:
1461818
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000699
AC XY:
508
AN XY:
727210
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00914
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000693
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00405
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000134
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00123
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00254
AC:
387
AN:
152282
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00271
AC XY:
202
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00765
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00235
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.00144
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00303
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000436
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Apr 04, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The vriant affects a non-conserved nucleotide and results in synonymous mutation. Mutation taster predicts a disease causing outcome for this change while 5/5 in silico tools via Alamut predict no impact on splicing. The variant was observed in the large and broad cohorts of the NHLBI-ES and ExAC projects at an allele frequency of 0.15% which greatly exceeds (~150 times) the maximal expected allele frequency of a disease causing ANK2 allele (0.001%), strongly supporting a benign nature for the variant. Based on the high allele frequency in the general population, the variant was classified as Benign. -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 12, 2017
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

ANK2: BP4, BP7 -

not specified Benign:3
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiac arrhythmia, ankyrin-B-related Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Long QT syndrome Benign:1
Jan 11, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Aug 31, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
4.2
DANN
Benign
0.85

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs76685232; hg19: chr4-114257165; API