4-113369660-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001148.6(ANK2):āc.11465G>Cā(p.Gly3822Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000412 in 1,614,074 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001148.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANK2 | NM_001148.6 | c.11465G>C | p.Gly3822Ala | missense_variant | 43/46 | ENST00000357077.9 | NP_001139.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANK2 | ENST00000357077.9 | c.11465G>C | p.Gly3822Ala | missense_variant | 43/46 | 1 | NM_001148.6 | ENSP00000349588 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00202 AC: 308AN: 152104Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000661 AC: 166AN: 250966Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000428 AC XY: 58AN XY: 135628
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000242 AC: 354AN: 1461852Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000219 AC XY: 159AN XY: 727228
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00204 AC: 311AN: 152222Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00214 AC XY: 159AN XY: 74430
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 02, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27930701) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2023 | ANK2: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Cardiac arrhythmia, ankyrin-B-related Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
Long QT syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 21, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at