4-127957589-T-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001371596.2(MFSD8):​c.66A>T​(p.Glu22Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00164 in 1,606,132 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. E22E) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0087 ( 23 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00089 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

MFSD8
NM_001371596.2 missense

Scores

2
16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.275
Variant links:
Genes affected
MFSD8 (HGNC:28486): (major facilitator superfamily domain containing 8) This gene encodes a ubiquitous integral membrane protein that contains a transporter domain and a major facilitator superfamily (MFS) domain. Other members of the major facilitator superfamily transport small solutes through chemiosmotic ion gradients. The substrate transported by this protein is unknown. The protein likely localizes to lysosomal membranes. Mutations in this gene are correlated with a variant form of late infantile-onset neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (vLINCL). [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0062261224).
BP6
Variant 4-127957589-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-127957589-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 129611.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr4-127957589-T-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr4-127957589-T-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00875 (1332/152278) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.03 (1247/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0286. There are 23 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 627 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 23 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MFSD8NM_001371596.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.66A>T p.Glu22Asp missense_variant 2/12 ENST00000641686.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MFSD8ENST00000641686.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.66A>T p.Glu22Asp missense_variant 2/12 NM_001371596.2 P1Q8NHS3-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00869
AC:
1322
AN:
152160
Hom.:
22
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0298
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00380
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00669
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00224
AC:
560
AN:
249756
Hom.:
6
AF XY:
0.00175
AC XY:
237
AN XY:
135090
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0302
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000199
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00148
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000894
AC:
1300
AN:
1453854
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
0.000783
AC XY:
567
AN XY:
723830
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0301
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000128
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000859
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00205
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00875
AC:
1332
AN:
152278
Hom.:
23
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00842
AC XY:
627
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0300
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00379
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00662
Alfa
AF:
0.000691
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00969
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0238
AC:
105
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00265
AC:
322
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00261
AC:
9
AN:
3464
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 05, 2012This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 08, 2016- -
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 7 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 7;C4015371:Macular dystrophy with central cone involvement Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsDec 01, 2021- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 18, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.093
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.49
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.46
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.024
T;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.73
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.61
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.35
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
.;.;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0062
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.88
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.97
L;L;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.41
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.050
.;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Benign
0.46
.;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.62
.;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.0030
B;B;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.15
MutPred
0.26
Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);Gain of glycosylation at S20 (P = 0.021);
MVP
0.70
MPC
0.085
ClinPred
0.0072
T
GERP RS
0.94
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.026
gMVP
0.40

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.080
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145529594; hg19: chr4-128878744; API