4-145639136-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_172250.3(MMAA):c.-4G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000192 in 1,613,920 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_172250.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- methylmalonic aciduria, cblA typeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet, G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMAA | NM_172250.3 | c.-4G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 2 of 7 | ENST00000649156.2 | NP_758454.1 | ||
MMAA | NM_001375644.1 | c.-4G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 2 of 7 | NP_001362573.1 | |||
MMAA | XM_011531684.4 | c.-4G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 2 of 7 | XP_011529986.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152108Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000358 AC: 9AN: 251356 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000205 AC: 30AN: 1461812Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000179 AC XY: 13AN XY: 727202 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152108Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74290 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Methylmalonic aciduria, cblA type Uncertain:1
- -
MMAA-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at