4-150436793-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4
The NM_001364905.1(LRBA):c.6852A>C(p.Gln2284His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000368 in 1,613,632 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q2284E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001364905.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- combined immunodeficiency due to LRBA deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001364905.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRBA | NM_001364905.1 | MANE Select | c.6852A>C | p.Gln2284His | missense | Exon 45 of 57 | NP_001351834.1 | ||
| LRBA | NM_001440430.1 | c.6885A>C | p.Gln2295His | missense | Exon 46 of 58 | NP_001427359.1 | |||
| LRBA | NM_006726.5 | c.6885A>C | p.Gln2295His | missense | Exon 46 of 58 | NP_006717.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRBA | ENST00000651943.2 | MANE Select | c.6852A>C | p.Gln2284His | missense | Exon 45 of 57 | ENSP00000498582.2 | ||
| LRBA | ENST00000357115.9 | TSL:1 | c.6885A>C | p.Gln2295His | missense | Exon 46 of 58 | ENSP00000349629.3 | ||
| LRBA | ENST00000510413.5 | TSL:1 | c.6852A>C | p.Gln2284His | missense | Exon 45 of 57 | ENSP00000421552.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000191 AC: 29AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000124 AC: 31AN: 250924 AF XY: 0.000103 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000387 AC: 565AN: 1461464Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000366 AC XY: 266AN XY: 727014 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000191 AC: 29AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74330 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Combined immunodeficiency due to LRBA deficiency Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces glutamine, which is neutral and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 2295 of the LRBA protein (p.Gln2295His). This variant is present in population databases (rs140538555, gnomAD 0.02%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with LRBA-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 567991). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt LRBA protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.6885A>C (p.Q2295H) alteration is located in exon 46 (coding exon 45) of the LRBA gene. This alteration results from a A to C substitution at nucleotide position 6885, causing the glutamine (Q) at amino acid position 2295 to be replaced by a histidine (H). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at