4-15514751-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001378615.1(CC2D2A):​c.762A>G​(p.Leu254Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00115 in 1,609,840 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L254L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0061 ( 10 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00063 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

CC2D2A
NM_001378615.1 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.64

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CC2D2A (HGNC:29253): (coiled-coil and C2 domain containing 2A) This gene encodes a coiled-coil and calcium binding domain protein that appears to play a critical role in cilia formation. Mutations in this gene cause Meckel syndrome type 6, as well as Joubert syndrome type 9. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
CC2D2A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • ciliopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Joubert syndrome 9
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • retinitis pigmentosa 93
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • COACH syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Meckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 4-15514751-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-15514751-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 257395.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.64 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00611 (931/152326) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0213 (886/41576). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0201. There are 10 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 421 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 10 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001378615.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CC2D2A
NM_001378615.1
MANE Select
c.762A>Gp.Leu254Leu
synonymous
Exon 9 of 37NP_001365544.1
CC2D2A
NM_001080522.2
c.762A>Gp.Leu254Leu
synonymous
Exon 10 of 38NP_001073991.2
CC2D2A
NM_001378617.1
c.615A>Gp.Leu205Leu
synonymous
Exon 7 of 35NP_001365546.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CC2D2A
ENST00000424120.6
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.762A>Gp.Leu254Leu
synonymous
Exon 9 of 37ENSP00000403465.1
CC2D2A
ENST00000503292.6
TSL:1
c.762A>Gp.Leu254Leu
synonymous
Exon 10 of 38ENSP00000421809.1
CC2D2A
ENST00000513811.5
TSL:1
n.942A>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 9 of 18

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00610
AC:
928
AN:
152208
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0213
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00144
AC:
357
AN:
248266
AF XY:
0.00108
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0212
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000498
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000798
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000499
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000633
AC:
922
AN:
1457514
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000549
AC XY:
398
AN XY:
724778
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0221
AC:
739
AN:
33412
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000651
AC:
29
AN:
44558
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26022
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39608
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000350
AC:
3
AN:
85796
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53324
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00157
AC:
9
AN:
5742
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000406
AC:
45
AN:
1108872
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00161
AC:
97
AN:
60180
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
46
91
137
182
228
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
24
48
72
96
120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00611
AC:
931
AN:
152326
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00565
AC XY:
421
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0213
AC:
886
AN:
41576
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00222
AC:
34
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000735
AC:
5
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00284
AC:
6
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
45
90
134
179
224
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00288
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00713
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 24, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 09, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Meckel syndrome, type 6 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

CC2D2A-related disorder Uncertain:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:1
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joubert syndrome 9 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.91
CADD
Benign
0.080
DANN
Benign
0.23
PhyloP100
-1.6
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs116198081; hg19: chr4-15516374; API