4-15601446-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The ENST00000634028.2(CC2D2A):​n.*442G>C variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.584 in 1,397,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 239,041 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.57 ( 24886 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.58 ( 214155 hom. )

Consequence

CC2D2A
ENST00000634028.2 non_coding_transcript_exon

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.946

Publications

32 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CC2D2A (HGNC:29253): (coiled-coil and C2 domain containing 2A) This gene encodes a coiled-coil and calcium binding domain protein that appears to play a critical role in cilia formation. Mutations in this gene cause Meckel syndrome type 6, as well as Joubert syndrome type 9. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
CC2D2A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • ciliopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Joubert syndrome 9
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • retinitis pigmentosa 93
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • COACH syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Meckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.64).
BP6
Variant 4-15601446-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-15601446-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 257382.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.62 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: ENST00000634028.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CC2D2A
NM_001378615.1
MANE Select
c.*21G>C
3_prime_UTR
Exon 37 of 37NP_001365544.1
CC2D2A
NM_001080522.2
c.*21G>C
3_prime_UTR
Exon 38 of 38NP_001073991.2
CC2D2A
NM_001378617.1
c.*21G>C
3_prime_UTR
Exon 35 of 35NP_001365546.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CC2D2A
ENST00000634028.2
TSL:1
n.*442G>C
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 34 of 34ENSP00000488669.2
CC2D2A
ENST00000424120.6
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.*21G>C
3_prime_UTR
Exon 37 of 37ENSP00000403465.1
CC2D2A
ENST00000503292.6
TSL:1
c.*21G>C
3_prime_UTR
Exon 38 of 38ENSP00000421809.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.572
AC:
86962
AN:
151904
Hom.:
24870
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.545
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.680
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.540
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.657
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.502
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.639
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.549
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.627
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.595
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.568
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.579
AC:
61752
AN:
106682
AF XY:
0.584
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.540
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.516
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.635
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.493
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.558
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.599
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.601
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.585
AC:
728351
AN:
1245112
Hom.:
214155
Cov.:
21
AF XY:
0.587
AC XY:
354092
AN XY:
603104
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.540
AC:
15070
AN:
27926
American (AMR)
AF:
0.498
AC:
9120
AN:
18316
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.638
AC:
12048
AN:
18878
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.527
AC:
18817
AN:
35686
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.646
AC:
33781
AN:
52324
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.554
AC:
25164
AN:
45406
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.641
AC:
2544
AN:
3968
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.587
AC:
581677
AN:
991102
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.585
AC:
30130
AN:
51506
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14110
28220
42330
56440
70550
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
16986
33972
50958
67944
84930
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.572
AC:
87016
AN:
152022
Hom.:
24886
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.570
AC XY:
42373
AN XY:
74318
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.546
AC:
22627
AN:
41448
American (AMR)
AF:
0.540
AC:
8244
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.657
AC:
2278
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.502
AC:
2592
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.639
AC:
3081
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.549
AC:
5791
AN:
10550
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.613
AC:
179
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.595
AC:
40414
AN:
67972
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.564
AC:
1190
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1939
3877
5816
7754
9693
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
752
1504
2256
3008
3760
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.494
Hom.:
1753
Bravo
AF:
0.566
Asia WGS
AF:
0.590
AC:
2050
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Jun 26, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Meckel syndrome, type 6 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joubert syndrome 9 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:1
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.64
CADD
Benign
0.10
DANN
Benign
0.80
PhyloP100
-0.95
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1134634; hg19: chr4-15603069; COSMIC: COSV58010172; COSMIC: COSV58010172; API