4-177438806-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000027.4(AGA):āc.446C>Gā(p.Thr149Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.987 in 1,611,942 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 787,480 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000027.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGA | NM_000027.4 | c.446C>G | p.Thr149Ser | missense_variant | 4/9 | ENST00000264595.7 | |
AGA | NM_001171988.2 | c.446C>G | p.Thr149Ser | missense_variant | 4/9 | ||
AGA | XM_047449722.1 | c.446C>G | p.Thr149Ser | missense_variant | 4/7 | ||
AGA | NR_033655.2 | n.508C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGA | ENST00000264595.7 | c.446C>G | p.Thr149Ser | missense_variant | 4/9 | 1 | NM_000027.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.933 AC: 141991AN: 152148Hom.: 67057 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.982 AC: 246952AN: 251388Hom.: 121720 AF XY: 0.987 AC XY: 134133AN XY: 135884
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.993 AC: 1449086AN: 1459676Hom.: 720380 Cov.: 46 AF XY: 0.994 AC XY: 721846AN XY: 726342
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.933 AC: 142088AN: 152266Hom.: 67100 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.936 AC XY: 69667AN XY: 74460
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Aspartylglucosaminuria Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | May 31, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 07, 2012 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Oct 22, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 13, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at