4-1805551-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000142.5(FGFR3):c.1535-8G>T variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000712 in 1,612,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000142.5 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGFR3 | NM_000142.5 | c.1535-8G>T | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000440486.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGFR3 | ENST00000440486.8 | c.1535-8G>T | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 5 | NM_000142.5 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00356 AC: 542AN: 152224Hom.: 3 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000955 AC: 239AN: 250248Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000819 AC XY: 111AN XY: 135594
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000410 AC: 599AN: 1460650Hom.: 6 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000359 AC XY: 261AN XY: 726622
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00361 AC: 550AN: 152342Hom.: 3 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00349 AC XY: 260AN XY: 74496
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 17, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 17, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at