4-185143289-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001151.4(SLC25A4):c.-84C>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00801 in 749,178 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 167 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001151.4 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- mitochondrial diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 12B (cardiomyopathic type), autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Fontaine progeroid syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
- mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 12A (cardiomyopathic type), autosomal dominantInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions, autosomal dominant 2Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal dominant progressive external ophthalmoplegiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Sengers syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Leigh syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC25A4 | NM_001151.4 | c.-84C>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 4 | ENST00000281456.11 | NP_001142.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC25A4 | ENST00000281456.11 | c.-84C>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 4 | 1 | NM_001151.4 | ENSP00000281456.5 | |||
SLC25A4 | ENST00000491736.1 | n.-84C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 4 | 5 | ENSP00000476711.1 | ||||
SLC25A4 | ENST00000491736.1 | n.-84C>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 4 | 5 | ENSP00000476711.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0194 AC: 2943AN: 151818Hom.: 95 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00511 AC: 3050AN: 597252Hom.: 73 Cov.: 8 AF XY: 0.00526 AC XY: 1679AN XY: 319172 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0194 AC: 2948AN: 151926Hom.: 94 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0194 AC XY: 1440AN XY: 74260 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
Progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at