4-186201150-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_207352.4(CYP4V2):​c.802-7C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.377 in 1,609,926 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 119,475 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.36 ( 10016 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.38 ( 109459 hom. )

Consequence

CYP4V2
NM_207352.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00001202
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0880

Publications

18 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CYP4V2 (HGNC:23198): (cytochrome P450 family 4 subfamily V member 2) This gene encodes a member of the cytochrome P450 hemethiolate protein superfamily which are involved in oxidizing various substrates in the metabolic pathway. It is implicated in the metabolism of fatty acid precursors into n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Mutations in this gene result in Bietti crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
CYP4V2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Bietti crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Illumina, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 4-186201150-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-186201150-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 166975.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.403 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CYP4V2NM_207352.4 linkc.802-7C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 6 of 10 ENST00000378802.5 NP_997235.3 Q6ZWL3-1
CYP4V2XM_005262935.5 linkc.802-7C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 6 of 10 XP_005262992.1
CYP4V2XM_047450077.1 linkc.406-7C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 8 XP_047306033.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CYP4V2ENST00000378802.5 linkc.802-7C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 6 of 10 1 NM_207352.4 ENSP00000368079.4 Q6ZWL3-1
CYP4V2ENST00000507209.5 linkn.1643-7C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 2 of 5 1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.357
AC:
54176
AN:
151946
Hom.:
10010
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.303
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.404
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.304
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.285
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.354
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.153
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.430
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.345
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.407
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.374
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.334
AC:
83499
AN:
250166
AF XY:
0.330
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.310
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.229
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.285
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.333
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.430
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.404
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.351
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.379
AC:
553203
AN:
1457862
Hom.:
109459
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.373
AC XY:
270226
AN XY:
725316
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.300
AC:
10016
AN:
33360
American (AMR)
AF:
0.237
AC:
10551
AN:
44534
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.288
AC:
7498
AN:
26052
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.329
AC:
13021
AN:
39534
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.154
AC:
13266
AN:
85922
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.433
AC:
23098
AN:
53352
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.280
AC:
1612
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.408
AC:
452059
AN:
1109114
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.367
AC:
22082
AN:
60232
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.436
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16354
32708
49063
65417
81771
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
13678
27356
41034
54712
68390
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.356
AC:
54200
AN:
152064
Hom.:
10016
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.352
AC XY:
26186
AN XY:
74310
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.302
AC:
12537
AN:
41500
American (AMR)
AF:
0.303
AC:
4641
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.285
AC:
989
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.354
AC:
1812
AN:
5120
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.154
AC:
745
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.430
AC:
4536
AN:
10560
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.350
AC:
103
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.407
AC:
27672
AN:
67982
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.377
AC:
797
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1790
3580
5369
7159
8949
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
520
1040
1560
2080
2600
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.373
Hom.:
6575
Bravo
AF:
0.347

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

May 04, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 17, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Bietti crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Corneal dystrophy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
1.3
DANN
Benign
0.51
PhyloP100
-0.088
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000012
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3817184; hg19: chr4-187122304; COSMIC: COSV66505327; COSMIC: COSV66505327; API