4-2059527-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_178557.4(NAT8L):c.16C>A(p.Pro6Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000017 in 1,001,926 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_178557.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- N-acetylaspartate deficiencyInheritance: AR, Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_178557.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAT8L | NM_178557.4 | MANE Select | c.16C>A | p.Pro6Thr | missense | Exon 1 of 3 | NP_848652.2 | Q8N9F0 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAT8L | ENST00000423729.3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.16C>A | p.Pro6Thr | missense | Exon 1 of 3 | ENSP00000413064.2 | Q8N9F0 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000413 AC: 6AN: 145330Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000128 AC: 11AN: 856596Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000125 AC XY: 5AN XY: 400366 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000413 AC: 6AN: 145330Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000566 AC XY: 4AN XY: 70622 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at