4-4862018-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_002448.3(MSX1):c.470-683C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000659 in 151,826 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002448.3 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- orofacial cleft 5Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- tooth agenesis, selective, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- tooth agenesisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- tooth and nail syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSX1 | ENST00000382723.5 | c.470-683C>G | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 | 1 | NM_002448.3 | ENSP00000372170.4 | |||
| ENSG00000308455 | ENST00000834195.1 | n.304-5229G>C | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 2 | ||||||
| ENSG00000308455 | ENST00000834196.1 | n.49-5229G>C | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000659 AC: 1AN: 151826Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000659 AC: 1AN: 151826Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74124 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at