4-54264951-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 1P and 16B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):c.661C>T(p.Leu221Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00444 in 1,613,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006206.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDGFRA | NM_006206.6 | c.661C>T | p.Leu221Phe | missense_variant | 5/23 | ENST00000257290.10 | NP_006197.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDGFRA | ENST00000257290.10 | c.661C>T | p.Leu221Phe | missense_variant | 5/23 | 1 | NM_006206.6 | ENSP00000257290 | P1 | |
PDGFRA | ENST00000508170.5 | c.*995C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | 1 | ENSP00000425648 | ||||
PDGFRA | ENST00000509092.5 | n.479C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/15 | 1 | |||||
PDGFRA | ENST00000509490.5 | c.661C>T | p.Leu221Phe | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 5/18 | 1 | ENSP00000424218 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00298 AC: 452AN: 151866Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00343 AC: 863AN: 251426Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00365 AC XY: 496AN XY: 135880
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00459 AC: 6706AN: 1461200Hom.: 16 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00455 AC XY: 3311AN XY: 726950
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00297 AC: 452AN: 151968Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00287 AC XY: 213AN XY: 74256
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:7
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | PDGFRA: BP4, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, flagged submission | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 20, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 05, 2021 | In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22718859, 27449473, 22703879, 25111073) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Aug 19, 2020 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 18, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 21, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 17, 2021 | - - |
Myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, flagged submission | clinical testing | Dept. of Cytogenetics, ICMR- National Institute of Immunohaematology | Aug 25, 2022 | - - |
Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at