4-54264959-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP6_Moderate
The ENST00000257290.10(PDGFRA):c.669C>A(p.Thr223=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,012 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T223T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000257290.10 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDGFRA | NM_006206.6 | c.669C>A | p.Thr223= | synonymous_variant | 5/23 | ENST00000257290.10 | NP_006197.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDGFRA | ENST00000257290.10 | c.669C>A | p.Thr223= | synonymous_variant | 5/23 | 1 | NM_006206.6 | ENSP00000257290 | P1 | |
PDGFRA | ENST00000508170.5 | c.*1003C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | 1 | ENSP00000425648 | ||||
PDGFRA | ENST00000509092.5 | n.487C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/15 | 1 | |||||
PDGFRA | ENST00000509490.5 | c.669C>A | p.Thr223= | synonymous_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 5/18 | 1 | ENSP00000424218 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461012Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726896
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 15, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at