Genetic Variant PDGFRA:p.Val332Val (chr4-54267616-C-T) – ACMG Classification: Benign (-17 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):c.996C>T(p.Val332Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00287 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0030 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

PDGFRA
NM_006206.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.107

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV104566381

Genes affected

PDGFRA (HGNC:8803): (platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha) This gene encodes a cell surface tyrosine kinase receptor for members of the platelet-derived growth factor family. These growth factors are mitogens for cells of mesenchymal origin. The identity of the growth factor bound to a receptor monomer determines whether the functional receptor is a homodimer or a heterodimer, composed of both platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and beta polypeptides. Studies suggest that this gene plays a role in organ development, wound healing, and tumor progression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, somatic and familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and a variety of other cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

PDGFRA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

gastrointestinal stromal tumor
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
polyps, multiple and recurrent inflammatory fibroid, gastrointestinal
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, G2P
congenital heart disease
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
isolated cleft palate
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

PDGFRA links:

ENSG00000282278 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000282278 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).

BP6

Variant 4-54267616-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-54267616-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 221101.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.107 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 311 Unknown,AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006206.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
PDGFRA	NM_006206.6	MANE Select	c.996C>T	p.Val332Val	synonymous	Exon 7 of 23	NP_006197.1
PDGFRA	NM_001347828.2		c.1071C>T	p.Val357Val	synonymous	Exon 8 of 24	NP_001334757.1
PDGFRA	NM_001347830.2		c.1035C>T	p.Val345Val	synonymous	Exon 7 of 23	NP_001334759.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
PDGFRA	ENST00000257290.10	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.996C>T	p.Val332Val	synonymous	Exon 7 of 23	ENSP00000257290.5
PDGFRA	ENST00000509092.5	TSL:1	n.814C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 6 of 15
PDGFRA	ENST00000509490.5	TSL:1	n.996C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 7 of 18	ENSP00000424218.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00204

AC:

311

AN:

152176

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000627

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00301

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000941

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00344

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00192

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00199

AC:

500

AN:

251014

AF XY:

0.00198

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000677

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00269

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000139

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00325

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00376

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00295

AC:

4317

AN:

1461854

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00281

AC XY:

2045

AN XY:

727222

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000508

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00259

AC:

116

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000115

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86250

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000520

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00362

AC:

4030

AN:

1111984

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00230

AC:

139

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.456

Heterozygous variant carriers

225

450

676

901

1126

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

156

312

468

624

780

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00204

AC:

311

AN:

152294

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00187

AC XY:

139

AN XY:

74478

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000625

AC:

AN:

41582

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00301

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5170

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4818

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000941

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00344

AC:

234

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00190

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.500

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00236

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00193

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00300

EpiControl

AF:

0.00296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:6

Dec 05, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 12, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

PDGFRA: BP4, BP7

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Benign:2

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Oct 10, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Jun 25, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.68

CADD

Benign

5.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.74

PhyloP100

-0.11

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.080

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over