4-54273604-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The ENST00000257290.10(PDGFRA):ā€‹c.1432T>Cā€‹(p.Ser478Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.125 in 1,613,404 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14,579 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S478F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.15 ( 2161 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.12 ( 12418 hom. )

Consequence

PDGFRA
ENST00000257290.10 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts P:1B:8O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.15
Variant links:
Genes affected
PDGFRA (HGNC:8803): (platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha) This gene encodes a cell surface tyrosine kinase receptor for members of the platelet-derived growth factor family. These growth factors are mitogens for cells of mesenchymal origin. The identity of the growth factor bound to a receptor monomer determines whether the functional receptor is a homodimer or a heterodimer, composed of both platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and beta polypeptides. Studies suggest that this gene plays a role in organ development, wound healing, and tumor progression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, somatic and familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and a variety of other cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), PDGFRA. . Gene score misZ 1.9401 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 3.4078 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with congenital heart disease, polyps, multiple and recurrent inflammatory fibroid, gastrointestinal, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, isolated cleft palate.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0077081323).
BP6
Variant 4-54273604-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-54273604-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41794.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.226 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PDGFRANM_006206.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1432T>C p.Ser478Pro missense_variant 10/23 ENST00000257290.10 NP_006197.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PDGFRAENST00000257290.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1432T>C p.Ser478Pro missense_variant 10/231 NM_006206.6 ENSP00000257290 P1P16234-1
PDGFRAENST00000509092.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.1250T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 9/151
PDGFRAENST00000509490.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1432T>C p.Ser478Pro missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 10/181 ENSP00000424218 P16234-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.154
AC:
23418
AN:
151798
Hom.:
2161
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.230
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.100
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.203
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0562
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.143
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.228
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.127
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0601
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.105
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.127
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.154
AC:
38733
AN:
251048
Hom.:
3673
AF XY:
0.150
AC XY:
20316
AN XY:
135690
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.236
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.285
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0579
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.143
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.208
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.123
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.125
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.122
AC:
177975
AN:
1461488
Hom.:
12418
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.122
AC XY:
89046
AN XY:
727074
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.230
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.275
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0629
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.142
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.205
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.121
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.107
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.120
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.154
AC:
23436
AN:
151916
Hom.:
2161
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.157
AC XY:
11659
AN XY:
74258
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.229
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.202
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0562
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.143
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.228
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.127
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.105
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.126
Alfa
AF:
0.120
Hom.:
1307
Bravo
AF:
0.163
TwinsUK
AF:
0.111
AC:
413
ALSPAC
AF:
0.109
AC:
420
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.226
AC:
995
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.103
AC:
882
ExAC
AF:
0.151
AC:
18396
Asia WGS
AF:
0.210
AC:
729
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.100
EpiControl
AF:
0.0983

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Benign:8Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 22, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
not specified Benign:1Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, flagged submissionclinical testingDept. of Cytogenetics, ICMR- National Institute of ImmunohaematologyAug 25, 2022- -
Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 08, 2019This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.050
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.64
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
1.0
DANN
Benign
0.66
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.080
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.5
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.5
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0070
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.071
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0077
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.34
N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.16
N
REVEL
Benign
0.088
Sift
Benign
0.30
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.29
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.065
MPC
0.41
ClinPred
0.0012
T
GERP RS
0.81
Varity_R
0.078
gMVP
0.63

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35597368; hg19: chr4-55139771; COSMIC: COSV57266881; COSMIC: COSV57266881; API