Menu
GeneBe

4-6301030-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 4P and 4B. PM1PM2BP4_Strong

The NM_006005.3(WFS1):c.1235T>C(p.Val412Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000261 in 1,614,094 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V412L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00028 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00026 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

WFS1
NM_006005.3 missense

Scores

2
9
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.78
Variant links:
Genes affected
WFS1 (HGNC:12762): (wolframin ER transmembrane glycoprotein) This gene encodes a transmembrane protein, which is located primarily in the endoplasmic reticulum and ubiquitously expressed with highest levels in brain, pancreas, heart, and insulinoma beta-cell lines. Mutations in this gene are associated with Wolfram syndrome, also called DIDMOAD (Diabetes Insipidus, Diabetes Mellitus, Optic Atrophy, and Deafness), an autosomal recessive disorder. The disease affects the brain and central nervous system. Mutations in this gene can also cause autosomal dominant deafness 6 (DFNA6), also known as DFNA14 or DFNA38. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 2 benign, 10 uncertain in NM_006005.3
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.039896995).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
WFS1NM_006005.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1235T>C p.Val412Ala missense_variant 8/8 ENST00000226760.5
WFS1NM_001145853.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1235T>C p.Val412Ala missense_variant 8/8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
WFS1ENST00000226760.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1235T>C p.Val412Ala missense_variant 8/81 NM_006005.3 P2
ENST00000661896.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1337+2885A>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000276
AC:
42
AN:
152108
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00735
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000480
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000700
AC:
176
AN:
251480
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000625
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
135914
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00919
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000259
AC:
379
AN:
1461868
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
104
AF XY:
0.000259
AC XY:
188
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00889
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000928
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000540
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000276
AC:
42
AN:
152226
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000417
AC XY:
31
AN XY:
74418
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00736
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000475
Alfa
AF:
0.000515
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000348
ExAC
AF:
0.000857
AC:
104
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 6 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterreference populationSoonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical CenterMar 18, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Wolfram syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineSep 06, 2018The p.Val412Ala variant in WFS1 has been reported in several studies in associat ion with hearing loss, diabetes, and goiter (Fukouka 2007, Yan 2013, Awata 2013, Choi 2013, Li 2016) but has also been identified in 0.92% (173/18864) of East A sian chromosomes, including 1 homozygote, by the Genome Aggregation Database (ht tp://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Therefore, this variant is classified as benign for hearing loss. ACMG/AMP criteria applied: PP3, BA1. -
WFS1-Related Spectrum Disorders Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 25, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.39
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.084
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.35
Cadd
Benign
19
Dann
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.32
T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.25
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.13
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.040
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.45
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.8
M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.74
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.3
N;N
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.75
Sift
Uncertain
0.021
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.026
D;D
Polyphen
0.98
D;D
Vest4
0.97
MVP
0.98
ClinPred
0.14
T
GERP RS
4.7
Varity_R
0.19
gMVP
0.72

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144951440; hg19: chr4-6302757; COSMIC: COSV56988152; COSMIC: COSV56988152; API