4-6301600-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_006005.3(WFS1):c.1805C>T(p.Ala602Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00526 in 1,614,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 339 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A602A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.027 ( 181 hom., cov: 34)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0030 ( 158 hom. )

Consequence

WFS1
NM_006005.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0830

Variant links:

Genes affected

WFS1 (HGNC:12762): (wolframin ER transmembrane glycoprotein) This gene encodes a transmembrane protein, which is located primarily in the endoplasmic reticulum and ubiquitously expressed with highest levels in brain, pancreas, heart, and insulinoma beta-cell lines. Mutations in this gene are associated with Wolfram syndrome, also called DIDMOAD (Diabetes Insipidus, Diabetes Mellitus, Optic Atrophy, and Deafness), an autosomal recessive disorder. The disease affects the brain and central nervous system. Mutations in this gene can also cause autosomal dominant deafness 6 (DFNA6), also known as DFNA14 or DFNA38. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

WFS1 links:

ENSG00000286176 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000286176 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0018597245).

BP6

Variant 4-6301600-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-6301600-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 45440.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr4-6301600-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr4-6301600-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0904 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
WFS1	NM_006005.3 link	c.1805C>T	p.Ala602Val	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 8	ENST00000226760.5	NP_005996.2	O76024A0A0S2Z4V6
WFS1	NM_001145853.1 link	c.1805C>T	p.Ala602Val	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 8		NP_001139325.1	O76024A0A0S2Z4V6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
WFS1	ENST00000226760.5 link	c.1805C>T	p.Ala602Val	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 8	1	NM_006005.3	ENSP00000226760.1		O76024

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0267

AC:

4066

AN:

152202

Hom.:

172

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0919

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0111

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000603

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0153

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00714

AC:

1795

AN:

251376

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00528

AC XY:

718

AN XY:

135868

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0910

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00587

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00387

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000294

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000361

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00375

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00299

AC:

4370

AN:

1461814

Hom.:

158

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00261

AC XY:

1900

AN XY:

727216

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0949

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00686

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00375

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000394

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00724

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0270

AC:

4114

AN:

152320

Hom.:

181

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0264

AC XY:

1963

AN XY:

74478

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0928

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0110

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00288

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000603

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0151

Alfa

AF:

0.00518

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0308

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0921

AC:

406

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000349

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00882

AC:

1071

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00722

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000436

EpiControl

AF:

0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:15

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:7

May 07, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Ala602Val in Exon 08 of WFS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 9.0% (336/3738) of African American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs2230720). -

Mar 20, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Aug 16, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 14, 2013

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 06, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

WFS1-Related Spectrum Disorders

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Monogenic diabetes

Benign:1

Feb 15, 2019

Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

ACMG criteria: BA1 (9.3% in gnomAD), BP4 (9 predictors, Revel score 0.271), BS2 (219 controls in T2DM, 104 homozygotes in gnomAD) [BP6 (Chicago, Emory, Partners, and GeneDx all call benign but no longer using BP6)]=benign -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 6

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Wolfram syndrome 1

Benign:1

Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

Potent mutations in WFS1 gene are associated with Wolfram's syndrome, an autosomal recessive condition, which cause diabetes mellitus, diabetes insipidus, deafness and optic atrophy.However no sufficient evidence is found to ascertain the role of this particular variant rs2230720 yet. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.062

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.48

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.39

CADD

Benign

0.015

DANN

Benign

0.29

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.048

T;T

Eigen

Benign

-1.7

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.7

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.029

LIST_S2

Benign

0.67

.;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0019

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.88

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.65

N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.33

PROVEAN

Benign

0.54

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.27

Sift

Benign

1.0

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

1.0

T;T

Polyphen

0.0010

B;B

Vest4

0.030

MVP

0.87

ClinPred

0.0051

GERP RS

-3.9

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.013

gMVP

0.62

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over