4-70645542-G-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_031889.3(ENAM):c.*687G>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.22 in 151,274 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,851 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.22 ( 8850 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.075 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
ENAM
NM_031889.3 3_prime_UTR
NM_031889.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.30
Genes affected
ENAM (HGNC:3344): (enamelin) Dental enamel forms the outer cap of teeth and is the hardest substance found in vertebrates. This gene encodes the largest protein in the enamel matrix of developing teeth. The protein is involved in the mineralization and structural organization of enamel. Defects in this gene result in amelogenesis imperfect type 1C.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 4-70645542-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-70645542-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 349520.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.634 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENAM | NM_031889.3 | c.*687G>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000396073.4 | NP_114095.2 | ||
ENAM | NM_001368133.1 | c.*687G>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 2/2 | NP_001355062.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENAM | ENST00000396073.4 | c.*687G>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | 1 | NM_031889.3 | ENSP00000379383 | P1 | ||
ENST00000472903.5 | n.99+7699G>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.220 AC: 33158AN: 151050Hom.: 8808 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
33158
AN:
151050
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0755 AC: 8AN: 106Hom.: 1 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.0606 AC XY: 4AN XY: 66
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
106
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
66
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.220 AC: 33257AN: 151168Hom.: 8850 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.217 AC XY: 15983AN XY: 73776
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
33257
AN:
151168
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
15983
AN XY:
73776
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
363
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Amelogenesis imperfecta Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at