4-71472728-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM1PM2PP2PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_001098484.3(SLC4A4):c.1661G>A(p.Arg554His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000186 in 1,612,200 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001098484.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC4A4 | NM_001098484.3 | c.1661G>A | p.Arg554His | missense_variant | 14/26 | ENST00000264485.11 | NP_001091954.1 | |
SLC4A4 | NM_003759.4 | c.1529G>A | p.Arg510His | missense_variant | 11/23 | ENST00000340595.4 | NP_003750.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC4A4 | ENST00000264485.11 | c.1661G>A | p.Arg554His | missense_variant | 14/26 | 1 | NM_001098484.3 | ENSP00000264485 | P3 | |
SLC4A4 | ENST00000340595.4 | c.1529G>A | p.Arg510His | missense_variant | 11/23 | 1 | NM_003759.4 | ENSP00000344272 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000660 AC: 1AN: 151560Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1460640Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726646
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000660 AC: 1AN: 151560Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 73984
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive proximal renal tubular acidosis Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Nov 01, 1999 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at