4-87981552-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 2P and 12B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_001040058.2(SPP1):c.294C>A(p.Asp98Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000144 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001040058.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPP1 | NM_001040058.2 | c.294C>A | p.Asp98Glu | missense_variant | 6/7 | ENST00000395080.8 | NP_001035147.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPP1 | ENST00000395080.8 | c.294C>A | p.Asp98Glu | missense_variant | 6/7 | 1 | NM_001040058.2 | ENSP00000378517 | P1 | |
ENST00000662475.1 | n.308-5690G>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000237 AC: 36AN: 152168Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000398 AC: 100AN: 251442Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000324 AC XY: 44AN XY: 135894
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000135 AC: 198AN: 1461840Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000142 AC XY: 103AN XY: 727230
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000223 AC: 34AN: 152286Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000295 AC XY: 22AN XY: 74456
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | May 16, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at