4-94308699-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_014485.3(HPGDS):āc.271A>Gā(p.Ile91Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00389 in 1,609,360 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 47 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014485.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPGDS | NM_014485.3 | c.271A>G | p.Ile91Val | missense_variant | 4/6 | ENST00000295256.10 | |
HPGDS | XM_005262932.4 | c.178A>G | p.Ile60Val | missense_variant | 3/5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPGDS | ENST00000295256.10 | c.271A>G | p.Ile91Val | missense_variant | 4/6 | 1 | NM_014485.3 | P1 | |
HPGDS | ENST00000514774.1 | n.351A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/5 | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00859 AC: 1307AN: 152074Hom.: 10 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00487 AC: 1216AN: 249878Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00455 AC XY: 615AN XY: 135058
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00339 AC: 4943AN: 1457168Hom.: 37 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.00344 AC XY: 2497AN XY: 724968
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00863 AC: 1313AN: 152192Hom.: 10 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00891 AC XY: 663AN XY: 74426
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 08, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at