5-112792445-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PVS1_ModeratePM2PP5
The NM_000038.6(APC):c.646-1G>C variant causes a splice acceptor, intron change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000038.6 splice_acceptor, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- desmoid tumorInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- familial adenomatous polyposis 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomachInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
- sarcomaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- APC-related attenuated familial adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Turcot syndrome with polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Cenani-Lenz syndactyly syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000038.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APC | NM_000038.6 | MANE Select | c.646-1G>C | splice_acceptor intron | N/A | NP_000029.2 | |||
| APC | NM_001407446.1 | c.676-1G>C | splice_acceptor intron | N/A | NP_001394375.1 | ||||
| APC | NM_001354896.2 | c.646-1G>C | splice_acceptor intron | N/A | NP_001341825.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APC | ENST00000257430.9 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.646-1G>C | splice_acceptor intron | N/A | ENSP00000257430.4 | |||
| APC | ENST00000508376.6 | TSL:1 | c.646-1G>C | splice_acceptor intron | N/A | ENSP00000427089.2 | |||
| APC | ENST00000502371.3 | TSL:1 | n.646-1G>C | splice_acceptor intron | N/A | ENSP00000484935.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 29
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1
The c.646-1G>C variant has not been reported in the literature nor previously identified by our laboratory. This variant is predicted to cause abnormal splicing because the nucleotide substitution occurs in the invariant region of the splice consensus sequence. In addition, in-silico or computational prediction software (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predicts a difference in splicing in 5 of 5 different programs, increasing the likelihood this variant is pathogenic. A different nucleotide change at the same position (c.646-1G>A) has been previously observed in one study in an individual with clinical features of FAP and they demonstrated that this variant abrogates the canonic splice-acceptor site of exon 6, leading to the activation of a cryptic “AG” splice-acceptor site by analyses of the cDNA and increasing the likelihood that the c.646-1G>C variant also has a functional consequence (Aceto 2005). Furthermore, this variant is of the type which is expected to cause the disorder. In summary, based on the above information, this variant is classified as Pathogenic.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at