5-112838949-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_000038.6(APC):c.3355C>G(p.His1119Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000657 in 152,092 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000038.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | ENST00000257430.9 | c.3355C>G | p.His1119Asp | missense_variant | Exon 16 of 16 | 5 | NM_000038.6 | ENSP00000257430.4 | ||
ENSG00000258864 | ENST00000520401.1 | n.228+9977C>G | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 7 | 3 | ENSP00000454861.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152092Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152092Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74276
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
- -
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18199528, 30709382) -
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Uncertain:1
In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt APC protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 469919). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with APC-related conditions. This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.01%). This sequence change replaces histidine, which is basic and polar, with aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 1119 of the APC protein (p.His1119Asp). -
Classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis Uncertain:1
This missense variant replaces histidine with aspartic acid at codon 1119 of the APC protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with APC-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/31388 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The p.H1119D variant (also known as c.3355C>G), located in coding exon 15 of the APC gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 3355. The histidine at codon 1119 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, in silico predictors for this gene do not accurately predict pathogenicity. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at