5-112839326-A-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000038.6(APC):c.3732A>G(p.Gln1244Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00196 in 1,613,316 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 57 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 30 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 27 hom. )

Consequence

APC
NM_000038.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.841

Variant links:

Genes affected

APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]

APC links:

ENSG00000258864 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000258864 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).

BP6

Variant 5-112839326-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112839326-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 183767.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-112839326-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.841 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0109 (1657/152306) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0375 (1558/41566). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0359. There are 30 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 801 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1657 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
APC	NM_000038.6 link	c.3732A>G	p.Gln1244Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 16	ENST00000257430.9	NP_000029.2	P25054-1Q4LE70

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
APC	ENST00000257430.9 link	c.3732A>G	p.Gln1244Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 16	5	NM_000038.6	ENSP00000257430.4		P25054-1
ENSG00000258864	ENST00000520401.1 link	n.228+10354A>G		intron_variant	Intron 3 of 7	3		ENSP00000454861.1		H3BNH8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0108

AC:

1651

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0374

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00471

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0110

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00304

AC:

759

AN:

249614

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00224

AC XY:

303

AN XY:

135044

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0381

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00349

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000999

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000978

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00148

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00103

AC:

1511

AN:

1461010

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000922

AC XY:

670

AN XY:

726742

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0337

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00352

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000928

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000531

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00255

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0109

AC:

1657

AN:

152306

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0108

AC XY:

801

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0375

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00471

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0109

Alfa

AF:

0.00429

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0121

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:17

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:8

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2018

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The APC p.Gln1244Gln variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant was identified in the dbSNP (ID: rs74380081) â€šÃ„Ãºwith benign alleleâ€šÃ„Ã¹, the ClinVar database (classified as â€šÃ„Ãºbenignâ€šÃ„Ã¹ by Ambry Genetics), the Clinvitae database (classified as a â€šÃ„Ãºvariant of unknown significance by Emory Genetics), and the UMD (3X, classified as â€šÃ„Ãºlikely neutralâ€šÃ„Ã¹). In the UMD database, the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic APC variant (c.4666delA (p.Thr1556LeufsX9)), increasing the likelihood that the p.Gln1244Gln variant does not have clinical significance. In addition, the variant was identified in several populations at polymorphic allelic frequencies: 1000 Genomes Project (frequency: 0.014), the African population in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (frequency: 0.038), and the African American cohort of the Exome Variant Server ESP Project (frequency: 0.036). The variant was not identified in the literature, nor was it identified in any of the following databases: InSiGHT Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database, â€šÃ„ÃºZhejiang Colon Cancer Databaseâ€šÃ„Ã¹, GeneInsight COGR database, COSMIC. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict the creation of a potential cryptic 3â€šÃ„Ã´ (splice donor) site; however, this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Jan 30, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:4

Mar 18, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 05, 2018

True Health Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 08, 2022

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 14, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Familial adenomatous polyposis 1

Benign:3

Mar 22, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.85

CADD

Benign

2.7

DANN

Benign

0.81

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over