5-112839543-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000038.6(APC):​c.3949G>C​(p.Glu1317Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00727 in 1,614,214 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 60 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E1317G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0055 ( 6 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0075 ( 54 hom. )

Consequence

APC
NM_000038.6 missense

Scores

1
2
16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts P:1B:25O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.69
Variant links:
Genes affected
APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 5 benign, 15 uncertain in NM_000038.6
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00723657).
BP6
Variant 5-112839543-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112839543-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 829.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-112839543-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr5-112839543-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00554 (844/152344) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00739 (503/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00686. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 363 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 844 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
APCNM_000038.6 linkc.3949G>C p.Glu1317Gln missense_variant Exon 16 of 16 ENST00000257430.9 NP_000029.2 P25054-1Q4LE70

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
APCENST00000257430.9 linkc.3949G>C p.Glu1317Gln missense_variant Exon 16 of 16 5 NM_000038.6 ENSP00000257430.4 P25054-1
ENSG00000258864ENST00000520401.1 linkn.228+10571G>C intron_variant Intron 3 of 7 3 ENSP00000454861.1 H3BNH8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00554
AC:
843
AN:
152226
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00574
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00380
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000565
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00739
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00438
AC:
1101
AN:
251162
Hom.:
8
AF XY:
0.00443
AC XY:
601
AN XY:
135724
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00523
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00402
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00507
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000416
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00646
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00604
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00745
AC:
10894
AN:
1461870
Hom.:
54
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00720
AC XY:
5236
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00618
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00391
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00520
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00197
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00863
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00864
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00554
AC:
844
AN:
152344
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00487
AC XY:
363
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00575
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00379
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000565
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00739
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00331
Alfa
AF:
0.00688
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00597
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00971
AC:
36
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00649
AC:
25
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00636
AC:
28
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00930
AC:
80
ExAC
AF:
0.00413
AC:
501
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00736
EpiControl
AF:
0.00640

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Benign:25Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Pathogenic:1Benign:6Other:1
Feb 05, 2020
Biochemical Molecular Genetic Laboratory, King Abdulaziz Medical City
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2017
Counsyl
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 24, 2014
Pathway Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 10, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Sep 22, 2000
OMIM
Significance: Pathogenic
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: literature only

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 22, 2023
Mendelics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
GeneReviews
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: literature only

- -

not specified Benign:6Other:1
Jul 01, 2020
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.Glu1317Gln variant in APC is classified as benign because of lack of conservation and it has been identified in 0.63% (810/128934, 7 homozygotes) of European chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). While variant is present in >12 papers comments suggesting non-pathogenicity. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1, BP4. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: reference population

- -

Oct 10, 2013
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Dec 03, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2018
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:6
Jul 21, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 18, 2019
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

APC: BP4, BS2 -

Nov 03, 2021
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2012
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Aug 11, 2017
True Health Diagnostics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 02, 2023
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 30, 2020
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 26, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jul 28, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.Glu1317Gln variant has been previously identified in the literature in 43/4470 (0.010) proband chromosomes and in 26/5002 (0.005) control chromosomes suggesting that this variant is a common variant observed 2 fold higher frequency in probands with attenuated FAP, FAP or multiple adenomas compared to controls (Aceto 2005, Curia 2012, Frayling 1998, Lamlum 2000, Plawski 2008, Azzopardi 2008, Hahnloser 2003, Liang 2013, Abdel-Malak 2015). One study demonstrated loss of heterozygosity in the colon cancer tumors in two individuals from the same family both retaining the variant, however segregation of this variant was not observed in two others with colorectal cancer in the same family and the although the family had multiple members affected with colon cancer their phenotypes were not consistent with FAP (White 1996). Further studies suggested the germline p.Glu1317Gln variant may provide a growth advantage for colorectal tumorigenesis when in combination with other weak mutant APC alleles (Dallosso 2009), but does not account for the occurrence of adenomas (Olschwang 2009 ). While some studies have suggested that the non-synonymous variant p.Glu1317Gln predisposes to multiple colorectal adenomas and CRCs (Lamlum 2000, Hahnloser 2003, Frayling 1998), other studies support a moderate increase in risk of CRC, or none ( Popat 2000, Zauber 2013, Rozek 2006). rnThe variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs1801166) “With other allele”, Clinvitae database (classified as benign and conflicting interpretations), COSMIC (in various tissues other than intestinal), InSiGHT Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (LOVD), Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (LOVD), ClinVar database (classifications: benign by Invitae, GeneDX, Emory Genetics, Biesecker Laboratory; uncertain significance by Mayo Clinic and Laboratory for Molecular Medicine Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine; pathogenic by OMIM and GeneReviews; and classification not provided by ITMI), GeneInsight - COGR database (classified as uncertain significance by a clinical laboratory), and UMD (5x with a “neutral” classification). The variant was identified by our laboratory in 6 individuals with colon or other cancers. The variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 15 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.003); HAPMAP-EUR in 6 of 1006 chromosomes (frequency: 0.006), HAPMAP-AFR in 4 of 1322 chromosomes (frequency: 0.003), HAPMAP-SAS in 3 of 978 chromosomes (frequency: 0.003); NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) in 80 of 8600 European American (frequency 0.009) and in 28 of 4400 African American alleles (frequency 0.006); the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Jan 13, 2015) in 500 of 121152 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0.004) (or 382 European individuals, 6 of which are homozygotes, 48 African, 4 Other, 32 Latino, 31 South Asian, 3 European (Finnish), increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant. In addition we have observed this variant co-occuring with a known pathogenic variant (APC, c.3183_3187delACAAA) in a patient with confirmed FAP. The p.Glu1317 residue is mostly conserved in mammals with the variant amino acid Gln present in rat, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein, increasing the likelihood that this variant does not have clinical significance; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as benign. -

APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.35
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.27
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Benign
0.95
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.56
D;D
Eigen
Benign
-0.21
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.052
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.70
.;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.043
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0072
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.20
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
L;L
PrimateAI
Benign
0.32
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.7
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.21
Sift
Benign
0.15
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.11
T;T
Polyphen
0.0010
B;B
Vest4
0.14
MVP
0.76
ClinPred
0.022
T
GERP RS
5.2
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.39

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1801166; hg19: chr5-112175240; COSMIC: COSV57322109; COSMIC: COSV57322109; API