5-112840500-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 1P and 6B. BS2PM2_SupportingBP2BP1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.4906G>T variant in APC is a missense variant predicted to cause the substitution of aspartate by tyrosine at amino acid position 1636 (p.Asp1636Tyr). APC is defined by the ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel (HCCP VCEP) as a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease (BP1). This variant has been observed in trans with the variant c.3100G>T (p.Glu1034*) (Bonn internal data) which is classified as Pathogenic by the HCCP VCEP in an individual with FAP (BP2). This variant has been observed in heterozygous state in 11 unrelated healthy adult individuals worth ≥ 10 healthy individual points in total (BS2; Ambry Genetics internal data). This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1.1 (PM2_Supporting). In summary, although there are both pathogenic and benign types of evidence for this variant, the pathogenic/benign evidence is not considered inconsistent with the final Likely Benign classification for FAP. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the HCCP VCEP: BS2, BP1, and BP2 (VCEP specifications version 1; date of approval: 12/12/2022). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA009798/MONDO:0021056/089
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000038.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- desmoid tumorInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- familial adenomatous polyposis 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomachInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- sarcomaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- APC-related attenuated familial adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Turcot syndrome with polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Cenani-Lenz syndactyly syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000038.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APC | MANE Select | c.4906G>T | p.Asp1636Tyr | missense | Exon 16 of 16 | NP_000029.2 | |||
| APC | c.4990G>T | p.Asp1664Tyr | missense | Exon 16 of 16 | NP_001394375.1 | ||||
| APC | c.4960G>T | p.Asp1654Tyr | missense | Exon 17 of 17 | NP_001341825.1 | R4GMU6 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APC | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.4906G>T | p.Asp1636Tyr | missense | Exon 16 of 16 | ENSP00000257430.4 | P25054-1 | ||
| APC | TSL:1 | c.4906G>T | p.Asp1636Tyr | missense | Exon 17 of 17 | ENSP00000427089.2 | P25054-1 | ||
| APC | TSL:1 | n.*4228G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 17 of 17 | ENSP00000424265.1 | E7EMH9 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000958 AC: 14AN: 1461866Hom.: 0 Cov.: 66 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 727238 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74354 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at