5-112841018-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_000038.6(APC):​c.5424C>T​(p.Asn1808Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000892 in 1,458,082 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000089 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

APC
NM_000038.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.21
Variant links:
Genes affected
APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).
BP6
Variant 5-112841018-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112841018-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 231814.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.21 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 13 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
APCNM_000038.6 linkc.5424C>T p.Asn1808Asn synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 16 ENST00000257430.9 NP_000029.2 P25054-1Q4LE70

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
APCENST00000257430.9 linkc.5424C>T p.Asn1808Asn synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 16 5 NM_000038.6 ENSP00000257430.4 P25054-1
ENSG00000258864ENST00000520401.1 linkn.228+12046C>T intron_variant Intron 3 of 7 3 ENSP00000454861.1 H3BNH8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000200
AC:
5
AN:
249464
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000148
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135122
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000219
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000165
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000892
AC:
13
AN:
1458082
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
53
AF XY:
0.00000827
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
725604
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000277
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000332
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
Bravo
AF:
0.00000378

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
May 18, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Nov 07, 2016
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 15, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Benign:2
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 02, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

not provided Benign:2
Aug 14, 2019
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 19, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
CADD
Benign
4.0
DANN
Benign
0.75

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs747721259; hg19: chr5-112176715; API