5-112841388-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_000038.6(APC):c.5794A>G(p.Thr1932Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T1932S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000038.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- desmoid tumorInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- familial adenomatous polyposis 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomachInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
- sarcomaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- APC-related attenuated familial adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Turcot syndrome with polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Cenani-Lenz syndactyly syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | ENST00000257430.9 | c.5794A>G | p.Thr1932Ala | missense_variant | Exon 16 of 16 | 5 | NM_000038.6 | ENSP00000257430.4 | ||
ENSG00000258864 | ENST00000520401.1 | n.228+12416A>G | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 7 | 3 | ENSP00000454861.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 65
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
- -
The p.T1932A variant (also known as c.5794A>G), located in coding exon 15 of the APC gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 5794. The threonine at codon 1932 is replaced by alanine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species; however, alanine is the reference amino acid in other vertebrate species. In addition, in silico predictors for this gene do not accurately predict pathogenicity. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 1932 of the APC protein (p.Thr1932Ala). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with APC-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 490321). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The alanine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at