5-112843380-T-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_000038.6(APC):ā€‹c.7786T>Gā€‹(p.Ser2596Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0001 in 1,613,604 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

APC
NM_000038.6 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.405
Variant links:
Genes affected
APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.07420811).
BP6
Variant 5-112843380-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112843380-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 142442.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=5}. Variant chr5-112843380-T-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 5 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
APCNM_000038.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.7786T>G p.Ser2596Ala missense_variant 16/16 ENST00000257430.9 NP_000029.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
APCENST00000257430.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.7786T>G p.Ser2596Ala missense_variant 16/165 NM_000038.6 ENSP00000257430 P1P25054-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152092
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000359
AC:
9
AN:
250584
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135452
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000795
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000107
AC:
157
AN:
1461512
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0000990
AC XY:
72
AN XY:
727060
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000897
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000133
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000994
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152092
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000404
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74288
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000123
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000453
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000494
AC:
6
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Uncertain:2Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsAug 22, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylOct 19, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Feb 17, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 09, 2021Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25604157, 25710373, 27443514, 30404791, 29684080) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 28, 2021- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 13, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsSep 11, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Apr 05, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 22, 2016- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 26, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 30, 2018Variant summary: APC c.7786T>G (p.Ser2596Ala) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-05 in 276400 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 8.7e-05 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.22 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in APC causing Familial Adenomatous Polyposis phenotype (7.1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.7786T>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with colorectal polyps, ovarian and endometrial cancer (Out_2015, Ring_2016, Schwarz_2015). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, six classify as VUS and one classifies as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.061
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.25
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.41
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.95
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.37
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.57
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.40
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.44
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.59
.;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.031
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.074
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.79
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.20
N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.34
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.32
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.16
Sift
Benign
0.82
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.92
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B
Vest4
0.081
MVP
0.66
ClinPred
0.020
T
GERP RS
2.1
Varity_R
0.030
gMVP
0.11

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138137162; hg19: chr5-112179077; API