5-132587981-G-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.943G>T(p.Val315Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00221 in 1,612,604 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 5 hom. )
Consequence
RAD50
NM_005732.4 missense
NM_005732.4 missense
Scores
2
6
11
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.88
Genes affected
RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015402764).
BP6
Variant 5-132587981-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132587981-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 128028.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=4, Benign=2}.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD50 | NM_005732.4 | c.943G>T | p.Val315Leu | missense_variant | 7/25 | ENST00000378823.8 | NP_005723.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD50 | ENST00000378823.8 | c.943G>T | p.Val315Leu | missense_variant | 7/25 | 1 | NM_005732.4 | ENSP00000368100.4 | ||
ENSG00000283782 | ENST00000640655.2 | c.646G>T | p.Val216Leu | missense_variant | 8/26 | 5 | ENSP00000491596.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00133 AC: 203AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
203
AN:
152150
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00120 AC: 299AN: 250054Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00115 AC XY: 156AN XY: 135240
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
299
AN:
250054
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
156
AN XY:
135240
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00230 AC: 3366AN: 1460336Hom.: 5 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00218 AC XY: 1583AN XY: 726570
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3366
AN:
1460336
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1583
AN XY:
726570
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00133 AC: 203AN: 152268Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00118 AC XY: 88AN XY: 74456
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
203
AN:
152268
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
88
AN XY:
74456
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
14
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
15
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
23
ExAC
AF:
AC:
152
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 11, 2014 | RAD50 has only recently been described in association with cancer predisposition and the risks are not well understood. This variant is denoted RAD50 c.943G>T at the cDNA level, p.Val315Leu (V315L) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Valine to a Leucine (GTA>TTA). This variant has been published in two individuals with familial breast cancer and in two with multiple primaries including laryngeal cancer (Tommiska 2006, Zió Kowska-Suchanek 2013). RAD50 Val315Leu was also reported in one healthy control in Zió Kowska-Suchanek et al (2013). This variant was observed with an allele frequency of 0.3% (23/8600) in European Americans in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, not frequent enough to be considered a polymorphism. This variant is a conservative substitution of one neutral non-polar amino acid for another, altering a position that is well conserved throughout evolution and is located in the coiled-coil region per UniProt. In silico analyses predict this variant to have a benign effect on protein structure and function. At a molecular level, the impact of this missense variant on protein structure and function is not known and thus we consider this to be a variant of uncertain significance. Furthermore, based on the currently available information, cancer risks associated with this variant, and the RAD50 gene, remain unclear. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 22, 2023 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 09, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 22, 2021 | Variant summary: RAD50 c.943G>T (p.Val315Leu) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0012 in 251062 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 19 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RAD50 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (6.3e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.943G>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with a variety of cancers such as breast cancer, multiple primary tumors as well as unaffected control cohorts (example, Harvey_2017, Tommiska_2006, Young_2016, Ziolkowska-Suchanek_2013). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (benign, n=1, likely benign, n=1, VUS, n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | May 15, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Apr 20, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 26, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 17, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;.;.;T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
.;.;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
.;.;.;M;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
.;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
.;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
.;.;.;T;T
Polyphen
0.78
.;.;.;P;.
Vest4
0.51
MutPred
0.21
.;.;.;Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0988);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0988);
MVP
0.47
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at