5-132595694-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.2091C>T(p.Val697Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000284 in 1,613,774 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

RAD50
NM_005732.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.119

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

RAD50 links:

ENSG00000283782 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000283782 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.34).

BP6

Variant 5-132595694-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132595694-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 142438.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.119 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAD50	NM_005732.4 link	c.2091C>T	p.Val697Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 25	ENST00000378823.8	NP_005723.2	Q92878-1A5D6Y3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RAD50	ENST00000378823.8 link	c.2091C>T	p.Val697Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 25	1	NM_005732.4	ENSP00000368100.4		Q92878-1
ENSG00000283782	ENST00000640655.2 link	c.1794C>T	p.Val598Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 26	5		ENSP00000491596.2		A0A1W2PQ90

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00152

AC:

231

AN:

152120

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00524

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00192

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000366

AC:

AN:

251302

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000287

AC XY:

AN XY:

135814

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00486

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000153

AC:

224

AN:

1461536

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000113

AC XY:

AN XY:

727096

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00544

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000291

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000450

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000364

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00154

AC:

235

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00142

AC XY:

106

AN XY:

74442

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00532

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00190

Alfa

AF:

0.000769

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00165

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder

Benign:3

Sep 03, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Jun 03, 2016

Counsyl

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Jan 08, 2018

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The RAD50 c.2091C>T (p.Val697Val) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide causes a synonymous change and 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 129/277028 control chromosomes (gnomAD), predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.004827 (116/24030). This frequency is about 77 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic RAD50 variant (0.0000625), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. A publication, Young_2016, cites the variant, however, with limited information. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likely benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Jan 23, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Nov 29, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 26, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Familial cancer of breast

Benign:1

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.34

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.70

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over