5-132604829-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP6

The NM_005732.4(RAD50):​c.2548C>T​(p.Arg850Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000118 in 1,611,912 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

RAD50
NM_005732.4 missense

Scores

1
7
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:6O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.54
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 5-132604829-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132604829-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 128006.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=2, not_provided=1}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RAD50NM_005732.4 linkc.2548C>T p.Arg850Cys missense_variant Exon 16 of 25 ENST00000378823.8 NP_005723.2 Q92878-1A5D6Y3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RAD50ENST00000378823.8 linkc.2548C>T p.Arg850Cys missense_variant Exon 16 of 25 1 NM_005732.4 ENSP00000368100.4 Q92878-1
ENSG00000283782ENST00000640655.2 linkc.2251C>T p.Arg751Cys missense_variant Exon 17 of 26 5 ENSP00000491596.2 A0A1W2PQ90

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000191
AC:
29
AN:
152052
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000242
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000280
AC:
70
AN:
250328
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000236
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
135332
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000328
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000133
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000112
AC:
163
AN:
1459742
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000118
AC XY:
86
AN XY:
726270
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000657
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000232
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000184
AC:
28
AN:
152170
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000242
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74410
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.0000481
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000408
ExAC
AF:
0.000255
AC:
31
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:6Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder Uncertain:2Benign:1
Jul 30, 2021
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Nov 18, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Oct 31, 2018
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1Other:1
-
GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Likely benign and reported on 10-11-2018 by Lab Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -

Nov 23, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 18, 2014
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

RAD50 has been only recently described in association with cancer predisposition and the risks are not well understood. This variant is denoted RAD50 c.2548C>T at the cDNA level, p.Arg850Cys (R850C) at the protein level, and results in the change of an Arginine to a Cysteine (CGT>TGT). This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as pathogenic or benign. RAD50 Arg850Cys was observed with an allele frequency of 0.1% (2/2100) in 1000 Genomes but was not observed in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project. This variant is a non-conservative substitution in which a positive polar amino acid is replaced with a neutral polar one, altering a position that is well conserved throughout evolution and is located in a potential coiled-coil domain (UniProt). Multiple in silico algorithms predict that this variant may be damaging to protein structure and function. At a molecular level, the impact of this missense variant on protein structure and function is not known and thus we consider this to be a variant of uncertain significance. Furthermore, based on the currently available information, cancer risks associated with this variant, and the RAD50 gene, remain unclear. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Jan 11, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 23, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified Benign:1
Feb 25, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

RAD50-related disorder Benign:1
May 11, 2023
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.27
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.14
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.0
CADD
Pathogenic
34
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.36
.;.;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.56
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.56
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
.;.;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.0037
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.018
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
2.0
.;.;.;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.50
T
REVEL
Benign
0.22
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.024
.;.;.;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D
Vest4
0.52
MVP
0.67
ClinPred
0.18
T
GERP RS
4.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.51
gMVP
0.34

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.42
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AG_spliceai
0.42
Position offset: 6

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs181961360; hg19: chr5-131940521; COSMIC: COSV54747927; COSMIC: COSV54747927; API