5-132866971-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_014402.5(UQCRQ):āc.90C>Gā(p.Val30=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,742 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V30V) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014402.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UQCRQ | NM_014402.5 | c.90C>G | p.Val30= | synonymous_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000378670.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UQCRQ | ENST00000378670.8 | c.90C>G | p.Val30= | synonymous_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_014402.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461742Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727188
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 22, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 07, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at