5-13690828-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):​c.*1156C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00501 in 152,190 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0050 ( 8 hom., cov: 32)
Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, single submitter B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.503
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 5-13690828-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13690828-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 350908.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00501 (763/152190) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.017 (705/41530). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0159. There are 8 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 368 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 8 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DNAH5NM_001369.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.*1156C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 79/79 ENST00000265104.5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DNAH5ENST00000265104.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.*1156C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 79/791 NM_001369.3 P4
DNAH5ENST00000681290.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.*1156C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 79/79 A1
DNAH5ENST00000683611.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.2364C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 5/5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00500
AC:
761
AN:
152072
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0170
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00210
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00230
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AC:
0
AN:
0
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
0
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00501
AC:
763
AN:
152190
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00495
AC XY:
368
AN XY:
74412
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0170
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00209
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00230
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00284
Alfa
AF:
0.00462
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00614
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.91
CADD
Benign
1.2
DANN
Benign
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115907706; hg19: chr5-13690937; API