5-13864620-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):​c.4373G>A​(p.Arg1458Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000594 in 1,614,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1458W) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 missense

Scores

1
3
13

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.69

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
DNAH5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008085579).
BP6
Variant 5-13864620-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13864620-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 238974.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00297 (452/152200) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0101 (421/41512). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00934. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 225 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DNAH5NM_001369.3 linkc.4373G>A p.Arg1458Gln missense_variant Exon 28 of 79 ENST00000265104.5 NP_001360.1 Q8TE73

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNAH5ENST00000265104.5 linkc.4373G>A p.Arg1458Gln missense_variant Exon 28 of 79 1 NM_001369.3 ENSP00000265104.4 Q8TE73
DNAH5ENST00000681290.1 linkc.4328G>A p.Arg1443Gln missense_variant Exon 28 of 79 ENSP00000505288.1 A0A7P0Z455
ENSG00000251423ENST00000503244.2 linkn.253+4065C>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 2 4
ENSG00000251423ENST00000637153.1 linkn.213+4105C>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 2 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00297
AC:
451
AN:
152082
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00432
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000812
AC:
204
AN:
251316
AF XY:
0.000736
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000636
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000968
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000346
AC:
506
AN:
1461826
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000325
AC XY:
236
AN XY:
727218
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0100
AC:
335
AN:
33470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000514
AC:
23
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
2
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000696
AC:
6
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000693
AC:
4
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000648
AC:
72
AN:
1111968
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00106
AC:
64
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.459
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
26
52
77
103
129
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00297
AC:
452
AN:
152200
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00302
AC XY:
225
AN XY:
74400
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0101
AC:
421
AN:
41512
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00118
AC:
18
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10592
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
2
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00427
AC:
9
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
19
39
58
78
97
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00112
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00327
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0118
AC:
52
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00104
AC:
126
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:3
May 06, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 26, 2021
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

May 20, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.18
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.28
T
Eigen
Benign
0.14
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.18
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.59
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0081
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.39
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
2.0
M
PhyloP100
2.7
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.7
N
REVEL
Benign
0.26
Sift
Uncertain
0.0030
D
Polyphen
0.41
B
Vest4
0.26
MVP
0.65
MPC
0.30
ClinPred
0.028
T
GERP RS
5.3
Varity_R
0.47
gMVP
0.44
Mutation Taster
=82/18
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61747551; hg19: chr5-13864729; COSMIC: COSV54233756; API