5-13886135-CAAAAAAAAAA-CAAAAAAA

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BA1

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):​c.2578-9_2578-7delTTT variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.219 in 1,297,624 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,081 homozygotes. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.21 ( 2646 hom., cov: 0)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.22 ( 1435 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.52

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
DNAH5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 5-13886135-CAAA-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13886135-CAAA-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 351200.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.274 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DNAH5NM_001369.3 linkc.2578-9_2578-7delTTT splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 17 of 78 ENST00000265104.5 NP_001360.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNAH5ENST00000265104.5 linkc.2578-9_2578-7delTTT splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 17 of 78 1 NM_001369.3 ENSP00000265104.4
DNAH5ENST00000681290.1 linkc.2533-9_2533-7delTTT splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 17 of 78 ENSP00000505288.1
ENSG00000251423ENST00000503244.2 linkn.254-10453_254-10451delAAA intron_variant Intron 1 of 2 4
ENSG00000251423ENST00000637153.1 linkn.214-10453_214-10451delAAA intron_variant Intron 1 of 2 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.213
AC:
26373
AN:
123808
Hom.:
2647
Cov.:
0
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.149
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.286
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.282
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.282
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0629
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.215
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.250
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.309
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.236
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.223
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.206
AC:
12664
AN:
61536
AF XY:
0.197
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.179
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.293
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.214
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0888
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.177
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.200
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.215
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.220
AC:
257846
AN:
1173838
Hom.:
1435
AF XY:
0.219
AC XY:
126977
AN XY:
579636
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.173
AC:
4453
AN:
25694
American (AMR)
AF:
0.264
AC:
6869
AN:
26062
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.229
AC:
4563
AN:
19922
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0664
AC:
2072
AN:
31190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.202
AC:
12574
AN:
62108
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.213
AC:
6391
AN:
29974
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.247
AC:
840
AN:
3404
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.226
AC:
209449
AN:
926556
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.217
AC:
10635
AN:
48928
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.394
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9564
19129
28693
38258
47822
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
8240
16480
24720
32960
41200
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.213
AC:
26357
AN:
123786
Hom.:
2646
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.214
AC XY:
12587
AN XY:
58684
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.149
AC:
5038
AN:
33782
American (AMR)
AF:
0.282
AC:
3397
AN:
12042
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.282
AC:
847
AN:
3004
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0620
AC:
222
AN:
3582
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.215
AC:
825
AN:
3844
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.250
AC:
1497
AN:
5994
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.292
AC:
69
AN:
236
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.236
AC:
13864
AN:
58834
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.221
AC:
366
AN:
1658
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.518
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
930
1860
2789
3719
4649
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
296
592
888
1184
1480
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0927
Hom.:
15

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Uncertain:1Benign:3
Aug 03, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2022
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Aug 24, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

Feb 16, 2025
Laboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
PhyloP100
1.5
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs71600031; hg19: chr5-13886244; API