5-13911399-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.1631C>T(p.Thr544Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000418 in 1,613,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001369.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH5 | NM_001369.3 | c.1631C>T | p.Thr544Ile | missense_variant | 12/79 | ENST00000265104.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH5 | ENST00000265104.5 | c.1631C>T | p.Thr544Ile | missense_variant | 12/79 | 1 | NM_001369.3 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000460 AC: 70AN: 152140Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00103 AC: 259AN: 251150Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000840 AC XY: 114AN XY: 135740
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000416 AC: 608AN: 1461144Hom.: 8 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000406 AC XY: 295AN XY: 726938
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000433 AC: 66AN: 152258Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000470 AC XY: 35AN XY: 74472
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 05, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 01, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at