5-142152170-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_030571.4(NDFIP1):c.*442C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.937 in 152,850 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 67,127 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_030571.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_030571.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDFIP1 | NM_030571.4 | MANE Select | c.*442C>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 8 of 8 | NP_085048.1 | Q9BT67-1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDFIP1 | ENST00000253814.6 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.*442C>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 8 of 8 | ENSP00000253814.3 | Q9BT67-1 | ||
| NDFIP1 | ENST00000944183.1 | c.*442C>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 9 of 9 | ENSP00000614242.1 | ||||
| NDFIP1 | ENST00000856977.1 | c.*442C>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 8 of 8 | ENSP00000527036.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.937 AC: 142527AN: 152162Hom.: 66819 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.939 AC: 535AN: 570Hom.: 250 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.932 AC XY: 313AN XY: 336 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.937 AC: 142645AN: 152280Hom.: 66877 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.940 AC XY: 69957AN XY: 74458 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at